Today, we’ve got a special treat for you. We are diving deep into a lens showdown to see if splurging over a thousand dollars on some new, shiny gear was worth it. We’re comparing the Canon RF 85 1.2 to the Sigma Art 85mm 1.4. Both are impressive lenses, but is the Canon worth the hefty price tag?
Let’s break it down and find out!
The Price Tag Dilemma
The Canon RF 85mm 1.2 comes with a jaw-dropping price of $2799. In contrast, the Sigma Art 85mm 1.4 is priced at a more modest $1199. However, if you’re using the Sigma on an R series body, you’ll need a ring mount adapter, which adds another $200 to the total, bringing it to $1399. That’s still a significant $1400 less than the Canon. But do the extra dollars translate into better performance?
Our History with These Lenses
We’ve had a similar debate before when we were shooting on 5D Mark IVs, deciding between the Canon EF 85mm 1.2 and the Sigma Art 85mm 1.4. Back then, the Sigma came out on top for us. But now, with the RF mount and our love for the 85mm focal length, we’re revisiting the debate with the new RF system.
Size and Weight: The Hefty Canon
One of the first things you’ll notice is the size and weight difference. The Canon RF 85mm 1.2 is hefty. It’s wider and heavier compared to the Sigma. On a long wedding day, this can be quite noticeable, especially if you have smaller hands like mine. However, the Canon’s stoutness means the weight is closer to the camera body, reducing the fulcrum effect and making it feel slightly more balanced despite being heavier.
Technical Specs and Practical Differences
Here’s where it gets interesting. The Canon’s RF system allows for larger diameter elements that sit closer to the image plane, supposedly improving image quality edge to edge with less light fallout. It also boasts a new connection system for better autofocus and features like the customizable control ring.
The Sigma Art, while slightly older, still holds its ground with a solid performance. The biggest difference on paper is the aperture: 1.2 for the Canon vs. 1.4 for the Sigma. This translates to a third of a stop difference in light, which isn’t huge but can be noticeable in certain shooting conditions.
The Consensus: Is RF Really That Much Better?
The general consensus is that the RF system and its lenses are a step above. They offer sharper images, more consistent performance, faster autofocus, less chromatic aberration, and creamier bokeh. Basically, they’re considered top-of-the-line.
Our Personal Take
For us, the real question is whether these improvements are worth the additional cost. As professional photographers who are compensated well for our work, the highest quality is non-negotiable. The Sigma is fantastic, but the Canon’s superior performance means fewer missed shots and less second-guessing during crucial moments. This peace of mind allows us to focus more on creating a memorable client experience without technical distractions.
Final Thoughts
At the end of the day, if a lens can help you execute your vision more confidently and deliver a better product, the investment can be worth it. For us, the Canon RF 85mm 1.2, despite its steep price, earns its place in our gear bag because it helps us maintain the high standards our clients expect.
So, are we convinced the Canon RF 85 1.2 is worth the cost? Absolutely. But we’d love to hear your thoughts. Do you agree? Disagree? Let’s chat about it in the comments!
P.S. Don’t forget to head over to our channel and subscribe for more vids like this!